Thursday 20 October 2011

Agnosticism / Atheism: Religious "Schools" for "Troubled" Teens Use Abuse, Torture

Agnosticism / Atheism
Get the latest headlines from the Agnosticism / Atheism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Religious "Schools" for "Troubled" Teens Use Abuse, Torture
Oct 20th 2011, 12:00

Silenced & Abused Girl
Silenced & Abused
Photo: Robert A Pears /
Photodisc / Getty

No one knows how many "schools for troubled teens" are being run by fundamentalist and conservative evangelical churches in America. That's a problem because these "schools" have developed a reputation for psychological, emotional, and even physical abuse -- especially when it comes to teen girls and all in the name of Jesus.

These schools and the people who run them can be quite evil, there's no two ways about it, but they cry "religious freedom" whenever their ability to abuse young girls is questioned.

At both the state and federal levels, the "troubled teen" industry--religious and secular--enjoys quiet support from many politicians. (Key fundraisers for Mitt Romney's 2008 and 2012 campaigns hail from Utah's teen-home sector.) Local courts promote the homes as an alternative to juvenile detention, and facilities can collect a variety of state and federal grants.

Congress has tried, and so far failed, to rein in the schools. In 2007, a spate of deaths at teen residential programs prompted a nationwide investigation by the Government Accountability Office. Its findings--which detailed the use of extended stress positions, days of seclusion, strenuous labor, denial of bathroom access, and deaths--came out in a series of dramatic congressional hearings over two years. The result was House Resolution 911 (PDF), which proposed giving residents access to child-abuse hotlines and creating a national database of programs that would document reports of abuse and keep tabs on abusive staff members.

Hephzibah House's Ron Williams and Reclamation Ranch's Jack Patterson urged supporters to fight the bill. In an open letter, Williams argued that it would "effectively close all Christian ministries helping troubled youth because of its onerous provisions." They were joined by a group called the National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs, which opposed HR 911 on the grounds that states--despite all evidence to the contrary--are best situated to oversee the homes. The bill passed in the House, but stalled in a Senate committee.*

In March 2010, the House passed the Keeping All Students Safe Act, a bill that would have banned the use of seclusion and physical or chemical restraints by any school that benefits from federal education money. (It, too, died in the Senate.) Andy Kopsa, who covers abusive homes in her blog, Off the Record, noted that GOP members whose districts host tough-love schools rallied against the act. They included former Indiana Rep. Mark Souder (Hephzibah House), Alabama Rep. Robert Aderholt (Reclamation Ranch, Rachel Academy), and North Carolina Rep. Virginia Foxx (King Family Ministries), who testified: "This bill is not needed...The states and the localities can handle these situations. They will look after the children."

In the absence of federal action, alumni of the teen institutions have been trying to expose the abuses. In 2008, Susan Grotte, a Hephzibah House alum, led some 60 survivors in campaigning for its closure; they wrote to newspapers and picketed outside the county courthouse in Warsaw, Indiana, near where the school is located. "We have laws to protect people from illegal incarceration," she says, "but apparently not if you're a teenage girl." In the past year, New Bethany alums staged a reunion trip to confront the Fords, and they joined with members of kindred groups such as Survivors of Institutional Abuse to gather and publicize survivor stories. SIA is planning a 2012 convention for adults who have been through "lockdown teen facilities."

Source: Mother Jones

There are of course secular schools as well which have been abusive, but these particular religious schools are part of a network and they all trace their origins back to a single Christian: Texas radio evangelist Lester Roloff, founder of the Rebekah Home for Girls in Corpus Christi in 1967.

Roloff started parading his girls around to show how wonderful his abusive methods were. He justified physical abuse by reciting the mantra "Better a pink bottom than a black soul" -- an excuse that sounds suspiciously like that used by the Inquisition, which is appropriate given that his idea of a "pink bottom" included whippings and inch-high welts.

For a time the activities of faith-based groups were regulated and monitored in Texas, but the lesson didn't stick and in 1998 governor George W. Bush deregulated again. This led to all the abusive schools to return "home" to Texas where the ground is very fertile for such behavior in the name of Jesus.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

No comments:

Post a Comment